This potential signing has me in two minds, why?
1. Danny Ward is what I like to call a "young bull" (young prop with that grunt you need up front and he will get better as he matures) with big match experience at club and international level. We as a new club are looking for the "cream of the crop" and as far as props go he is one of the best available for 2007.
At the minute we have Luke Bailey who IMO is the best prop in the game when fit. We also have the emerging Anthony Laffranchi who is a local boy destined for perhaps higher honors in this game after a breakout season in 2005 with the Wests Tigers. Laffranchi if need be can pack into the second row as well.
I believe a contending NRL team needs a really good three man prop rotation in the modern game, signing Ward gives us that. If we are looking at what will help find success in 2007, the Ward signing does make sense.
2. "We will sign the person before the player", a quote I agree with though I would like to think we are not going to toe the line of being morally above a player guilty of a making a mistake that better players in the past have made e.g. Brad Fittler when as Australian captain was arrested for a alcohol related instance. There is a fine line here.
I don't know the FULL STORY on Danny Ward. I know of the drink driving conviction, I know of a run in with coach Tony Smith when in France - whilst the drink driving is inexcusable, do we have the right to label him "damaged goods"?
edit - After re-reading the article, I notice there is two drink related instances prior to the drink driving charge - hmm.
"Damaged goods" at 25? I don't think so. A mate of mine from school beat worse demons at the age of 33 and is now a successful real estate agent in Sydney. The trappings of being a professional sportsman though is a different kettle of fish.
The IRL board needs to come down on the NRL and Super League ensuring tougher penalties are handed out to players who are guilty of alcohol related offenses that damages our game.
"One bitten, twice shy"
If Ward comes back a better person after this recent sacking, I believe he is deserving of a second chance. For all we know he may just look at community initiatives in the UK promoting awareness about drink driving.
Will signing Danny Ward damage our reputation? IMO no - from memory he is not a serial offender, he is a young guy guilty of making an inexcusable error in better judgment.
edit - there is potential for 'egg on our face' here due to the player in question striking out three times' though. Do we believe a new team, a new country can steer this guy in the right direction?
Again, if Michael and John think Ward will not fit in with the culture we are bringing to the NRL, he won't be signed. We as fans IMO should be looking at this from all angles, not just the one reported recently.
This will be every bit as interesting as the possible signing of Prince and Mathers.
DeeGan